dalekboy: (Soaped Monkeys Of Fandom!)
dalekboy ([personal profile] dalekboy) wrote2008-03-26 03:13 pm

Irrelevance to the new fen

This post is taken from a bunch of replies on a friend's journal, that it was decided we should stop hijacking and move the discussion somewhere else.

The problem is that a lot of fans want to get along, and many longer term fans don't like change, so the old fans don't change and the new fans try to fit in. The newer folks aren't encouraged to exptress their ideas, and fans have always been good at shouting down those they see as wrong.

I tend to think that when one is well-known and respected in the scene, they have a responsibilty to the newer folks to keep an open mind and to give them the chance to express themselves.

For instance, I have the newer people in Melbourne saying they don't see the point of having fan guests. I disagree with their opinion, but respect and understand that if they feel that way, then many more new folks will as well. So I either need to justify why we do it well enough that they can see my point-of-view, or rethink having fan guests in order to be relevant to the newer folks.

Though that said, I think the fan guest issue is a tiny one compared to how magnificently irrelevant our style of cons currently are to the new crop of fans.

New fans aren't coming to cons. They see them as over-priced, they don't see that they will get any value for money, and when they do come along, they have a hard time making friends because they're shy and because many of us are shy, we're more comfy talking to people we already know.

And then they hear us slagging off 'mundanes' and similarly showing fandom's intolerance for those not like themselves. So to new folks we come across as more exclusive than inclusive.

So discuss... and especially if you're one of the newer fans, please, please, please speak up and tell us what you'd like to see at cons, and what you think needs to be changed.

Re: And another thing...

[identity profile] baby-elvis.livejournal.com 2008-03-31 11:21 am (UTC)(link)
I went to my first con at 16, without knowing anyone at all. There had been a brief mention in the West Australian newspaper that I read. I was nervous, yes, and so, I took my Mum with me. Swancons were much smaller in those days, and so as a new person you stood out! I was swept up by people who were at the front desk and chatted to, shown around and had some con things explained. The program listed all the clubs in WA, so that you could continue to be fannish for the rest of the year.

Now, being a 16 year old female at swancon in 1981 probably helped my acceptance. But, I think it was more important that I was recognised as new, and so people sought me out to make sure I was okay. Having some mark on badges etc, of 'newbie' status might be helpful. Perhaps each day there could be a lunch meet up for new people and more experienced attendees (who could be scheduled to be there.) I think many would find that 'formal' structure to be helpful and safe.

Re: And another thing...

[identity profile] capnoblivious.livejournal.com 2008-03-31 11:47 am (UTC)(link)
Now, being a 16 year old female at swancon in 1981 probably helped my acceptance.

Um. Possibly. :)

My problem with a marker of newbie status is that it can make one feel terribly exposed - see, if it works according to plan and you're swept up into the wonder that is fandom, well and good. If not, you're left standing around uselessly wearing a said marker of newbie status.

The balance point between the number of people you'd help, and the number you'd alienate would depend very heavily on the treatment people with newbie markers were given. Largely ignored: you feel the community has marked you as ignorable. Largely welcomed: you feel welcomed.