Heckling
Before going to John's show, I jokingly asked him if he needed a heckler. He assured me that he didn't. I enjoyed his show but it's only now that I've got to stop and rest a bit that I started to think about hecklers and how much I hate them.

I've had the interesting experience of being heckled and then getting to, almost immediately, get my own back. They had interrupted my fairly carefully worked out routine several times, enough so that I lost my flow completely and actually gave up, half done. Thing was, their routine was next. I said a little bit during it, but tried to let actions speak louder than words, standing out of his view but visible to the audience, miming to his words, pretending to yawn, wank, etc. The audience was firmly on my side, having seen that I'd had my routine disrupted.

And afterwards, rather upset, he told me that all he wanted was to be allowed to deliver his routine. What on Earth did he think I had wanted?

He fell into the trap that most hecklers fall into, the belief that they are adding to the act, making it better for everyone. The thing is, this is rarely the case. Most hecklers only manage to annoy the audience, disrupt the speaker and generally reduce the enjoyment for everyone.

I know of several comedians who have talked about people who badgered them relentlessly through an act, coming up to them afterwards and telling them how great it was, that the pair of them had had a lot of fun. And there doesn't seem to be a way to get through that no, you didn't help the comedian, you hurt him.

That said, I love the comedian who, on being heckled called the guy up and dared him to do better, then found himself entranced as the guy revved up the audience and got them all having a good time. He was so impressed, he named his next tour after the guy's catch-phrase "Go you Big Red Fire Engine!"

It happens at fan stuff too, though that's often less the true heckling and more the wanting to be a part and have a say. All it usually takes is one person to yell out something out of turn, and then you get a small handful of others. Now this is appropriate and even welcome in some panels, but not in others, and the most common offenders aren't very good at telling the difference.

The funny thing is, many of these people would be mortified if they realised that people weren't enjoying their contribution, they honestly feel that others are enjoying it as much as they are. Fortunately in this regard, the principal offenders haven't turned up in a few years. I'd be more than happy to see them back at cons, just hopefully they'd be a little more restrained in their enthusiasm.

Hecklers are hard to deal with, for both the audience and the performers. There are inevitably a large chunk of the audience who want them to shut up, but are unable to bring themselves to say something, because then they'd feel bad or rude. So instead they go on having their time spoilt. For the performer it's much, much harder. You never know how a heckler is going to react. A clever putdown may shut them up, or they may then start to try to outdo you. You have to be careful what you say because if you lose it or come out with something too full on, you may actually turn the audience against you. And, of course, the danger of telling the heckler to step on the stage if he thinks he can do a better job has already been illustrated.

I like to think that when hecklers die, they get to the other side where a bunch of demons are there saying things like, "Bloody hell, even radiation gets a half-life, an' you couldn't even manage that, ya tool!"




Sapphire and Steel
British telefantasy show that had a budget so small that it made the average Doctor Who story look like it was put together with all the resources of a Bond film. What makes Sapphire and Steel stand out is the writing and ideas present. It's a true example of content over budget, of characters and ideas being more important than special effects.

The basic idea of the series is that Sapphire and Steel are time agents, sent to weak points in time. A weak point may be caused by anything, a mixture of the very old and the very new, a child's nursery rhyme, etc. Things exist outside time, and when they find a weakness, they try to break through into our reality. They want to disrupt time, create bigger breaks, manipulate events and people to their own ends, and Sapphire and Steel must stop them.

The two main characters are played by Joanna Lumley and David McCallum. They aren't good guys. They aren't bad guys either. They are there to do a job and sometimes they can save everyone, sometimes they can't, and sometimes they need to sacrifice someone to save the day, or at least halt the situation. The villains/creatures they deal with have been blobs of light, living shadow, a creature that was brought into existence through the process of photography, etc.

The stories often take place in a single location - a house or train station, for instance - a side effect of the miniscule budget. The stories are sometimes quite slow and long too, one runs for eight episodes, and certainly benefit from being watched only one or two a day.

There's only one story of the six they produced that I think of as a dud, and that's more down to the characters they interact with all being unlikeable than anything. I still think one of the best is the episode based around photographs. Never thought someone burning a photo would give me chills.

The series ended simply because the availability of the leads was becoming more and more troublesome. Both Lumley and McCallum were in high demand, so it was difficult to get their schedules to match up to get each of the three seasons made.

Sapphire and Steel is surreal, interesting, clever, witty television. It's one of the few series that I recommend everyone watch. I often suggest Story 4 (S&S didn't have story titles, though this one is often called 'The Photographs') as a good starting point. Only four episodes long and a suitably bizarre and interesting idea. But I honestly think everyone should just start at the beginning and work their way through the lot. It's certainly worth the time.

The husband and wife team that created and wrote for the series, P.J. Hammond, are writing an episode of the new Doctor Who spin-off series, Torchwood. This for me and a few others, was one of the most exciting pieces of news imaginable.

From: [identity profile] kaths.livejournal.com


Hmm, I've never seen Sapphire and Steel, I'll put it on my 'to watch' list. Did it actually air in Australia?

From: [identity profile] thinarthur.livejournal.com


Certianly not on free to air but possibly on pay TV. I have all the DVD's, I can burn you copies no prob.

From: [identity profile] kaths.livejournal.com


I'll see how I go with downloads, and let you know if it doesn't work out at this end. I've got one ep so far!

From: [identity profile] cheshirenoir.livejournal.com


On the hecklers front, I am reminded of the putdown used by Mr Stross to the person who WOULDN'T SHUT UP in the front row.

They guy was rabbiting on about democracy. Mr Stross roared "Eat Shit! A hundred million flies can't be wrong!" and the guy was quiet from then on.

From: [identity profile] angriest.livejournal.com


I heard about this, and I wasn't even *at* that convention.

S&S is cool. I had no idea P.J. Hammond was a husband and wife team, though, I always assumed it was just the one guy. Hammond almost wrote for Doctor Who in 1986, but then you probably knew that...
pedanther: (vampire kermit)

From: [personal profile] pedanther


To the best of my knowledge, Peter J. Hammond is not a gestalt entity.

I have a horrible feeling Danny's got him confused with Pip'n'Jane Baker...

From: [identity profile] thinarthur.livejournal.com


I saw them on one of the DW Confidential docos and was surprised. I'd always imagined them as sprightly 'Sci-fi" types, like a writing equivalent of Peter Davison & Sandra Dickinson, but they were more like Alf Garnett and the silly old Moo

From: [identity profile] dalekboy.livejournal.com


Not confusing Pip and Jane.

As I've been given to understand, when it's written by Peter Hammond, it's him, when it's P.J. Hammond, it's him and the missus.

Tricky may be wrong, but when it comes to this sort of info, I can count the number of times he's buggered up on one hand over a 25 year period, so I rarely doubt him.
ext_54569: starbuck (Default)

From: [identity profile] purrdence.livejournal.com


I've only seen 2 hecklers I've liked... and they're made of felt...

From: [identity profile] gutter-monkey.livejournal.com


Yeah, hecklers can be a pain in the ass, but they can also be useful. If a heckler has the opportunity/inclination to yell something that often indicates that the act has hit a low point and the audience's attention is wandering. If a comedian is repeating material many times over as part of his standard act and often gets heckled at the same point in the show then that might indicate that the material needs to be reworked.

A heckle can also save a gig, especially if the comedian has some really great put-downs prepared. I'm completely against heckling to the point that I barely even make any noise when a comedian asks me to, but one time a friend of mine was losing his audience so I heckled him, he thrashed me and in doing so he got the audience back on side.

From: [identity profile] gutter-monkey.livejournal.com


Addendum: there are some comedians who get very very disappointed if they're not heckled, but this is usually when they're playing characters like Neil Hamburger of Hank Ruby who are deliberately bad.

It's awesome to see one of their gigs when most of the audience aren't in on the joke and don't realise they're being deliberately awful. :D
ext_208355: (Default)

From: [identity profile] king-espresso.livejournal.com

Hecklers


As a heckler, there's enough in your posting there to make me uncomfortable, and rightly so. Mea culpa. I'm always willing to listen to feedback, even negative. Oddly enough, I only heckle people I like. (Weird that.) But I can't see anything you wrote with which I disagree.


From: [identity profile] morganjaffit.livejournal.com

Re: Hecklers


It may be worthwhile asking the performers you know if they like being heckled. Audiences too.

I seriously doubt you're going to find any performers who say they do - and few audience members.

From: [identity profile] ghoath.livejournal.com


i enjoyed the little that i saw of saphire and steel. it is one of those things i wish i could turn back the clock and make my foxtel watching decisions a bit more carefully.
I assume you know about the big ginish productions.

I wouldn't know what heckling is like as a comedian, but I know as a guest lecturer/tutorer it is something that I have gotten used to, mostly because ti's so important for the audience to ask questions. Having said that, it does make you more vounerable.

From: [identity profile] gutter-monkey.livejournal.com


I'd draw a distinction between heckling and asking questions, especially in a lecture/tutorial.

Unless, of course, the questions were something like "Why have you chosen such a gay font to use in that overhead projection?"

That'd be heckling. ;)

From: [identity profile] drhoz.livejournal.com


of course, then you have *drunk* hecklers... who don't even realise they're heckling...

From: [identity profile] thinarthur.livejournal.com


Heckling- Like it or not, hecklers go with the territory, get used to it or don't do it. I have a recording of Doug Adams biographer Simmo at the famous UK venue "Comedy Store", that really was raw meat for the balcony.

Sapphire & Steel- I doubt that it had less of a budget that contempoary Dr Who (we're talking 17th season "Horns of Nimon" here) but a much heftier proportion would have gone on the fees for its stars. Also, Granada would not have had the facilities at its disposal that the BBC did, hence the studio bound approach. Another series from the same period was "Omega Factor" with James Hazeldine & Louse Jameson, any of you dudes seen that?
.

Profile

dalekboy: (Default)
dalekboy

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags